Gallery of Lights


Home Login
Album list Last uploads Last comments Most viewed Top rated My Favorites Search
Home > User galleries > joe_347V > Fluorescent Lamps
Ottlite 13w Visionsaver Plus
Here's a Ottlite 14w Visionsaver Plus lamp that's intended to run in a electronic ballasted Ottlite desk lamp but runs fine on 15w preheat ballasts. The plastic sockets fit standard T5 lampholders so retrofitting a regular striplight for these is a snap. 
Keywords: Lamps

Ottlite 13w Visionsaver Plus

Here's a Ottlite 14w Visionsaver Plus lamp that's intended to run in a electronic ballasted Ottlite desk lamp but runs fine on 15w preheat ballasts. The plastic sockets fit standard T5 lampholders so retrofitting a regular striplight for these is a snap.

stuff003.jpg 100_2045.JPG 100_2044.JPG 100_2042.JPG Armlightlistcodedblacktest.JPG
File information
Filename:100_2044.JPG
Album name:joe_347V / Fluorescent Lamps
Keywords:Lamps
Company and Date Manufactured:Ottlite
Model Number:F13T4
Wattage:13w
Lamp Type:Fluorescent
Filesize:96 KiB
Date added:Nov 03, 2010
Dimensions:1000 x 750 pixels
Displayed:93 times
Color Space:sRGB
Contrast:0
DateTime Original:2010:11:02 02:51:45
Exposure Bias:0 EV
Exposure Mode:0
Exposure Program:Program
Exposure Time:1/90 sec
FNumber:f/4
Flash:Compulsory Flash
Focal length:11.6 mm
ISO:80
Light Source:Unknown: 0
Make:Eastman Kodak Company
Max Aperture:f/3.9
Model:KODAK EASYSHARE C433 ZOOM DIGITAL CAMERA
URL:http://www.galleryoflights.org/mb/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=3839
Favorites:Add to Favorites

Comment 1 to 5 of 5
Page: 1

GullWhiz   [Nov 03, 2010 at 02:36 AM]
thats one odd endcaps!
joe_347V   [Nov 03, 2010 at 02:48 AM]
Yep, I was wondering why they decided to use them instead of the metal ones.
SeanB~1   [Nov 03, 2010 at 04:44 AM]
It probably enables them to cut the glass shorter, and offers the ability ti use a smaller diameter glass to cut cost but still fit a standard holder.
Medved   [Nov 03, 2010 at 06:45 AM]
The reason for T4 instead of T5 is not the cost, as on such small tubes the processing (part not dependent on product size, but on it's complexity) is way more expensive then the raw material and the shorter tube mean the assembly is more complex then standard - so i guess this would eve be more expensive to make then standard T5.
Thinner tube allow to boost efficacy, if you are able to keep the mercury pressure on the optimum level on such elevated temperature (so with the use of amalgam concept). This is a try to make the more efficient T4 tube compatible with fixtures designed for T5. The tube has to be shorter, as thinner tube yield higher voltage drop per unit length.
The question is, how well is the design done, so if the possible efficacy increase is not compromised by the use of poor quality materials (e.g. phosphor, amalgam,...)
dor123   [Nov 03, 2010 at 08:40 AM]
Eurolux manufactures T4 fluorescents with the usual metal end caps.
They are available in 8W and 20W, with triphosphors coating and are no more efficient then the halophosphors tubes (65 lm/w for the 20W and 48.75 lm/w for the 8W).
They have also only 6000 hours life on IS electronic ballast.

Comment 1 to 5 of 5
Page: 1