Gallery of Lights


Home Login
Album list Last uploads Last comments Most viewed Top rated My Favorites Search
Home > User galleries > Vince > Collection of incandescent lamps
Return to the thumbnail page FILE 33/64 Return to start See previous file See next file Skip to end
Globe Enersaver 43W halogen lamp Those would supposedly replace a 60W bulb. They DO replace their own 60W with the same lumen output, although most 60W lamps of the big Three have a higher lumen output, making them no more efficient than the Enersavers pictured here. These bulbs are only slightly more efficient than a typical 40W incandescent (500 lm) with 550 lm at 43W. I do like the fact they run much cooler, making them a better choice for completely enclosed fixtures. Keywords: Lamps

Globe Enersaver 43W halogen lamp

Those would supposedly replace a 60W bulb. They DO replace their own 60W with the same lumen output, although most 60W lamps of the big Three have a higher lumen output, making them no more efficient than the Enersavers pictured here.

These bulbs are only slightly more efficient than a typical 40W incandescent (500 lm) with 550 lm at 43W. I do like the fact they run much cooler, making them a better choice for completely enclosed fixtures.

HPIM0191.JPG HPIM0189.JPG HPIM0187.JPG HPIM0197.JPG HPIM0196.JPG
File information
Filename:HPIM0187.JPG
Album name:Vince / Collection of incandescent lamps
Keywords:Lamps
Filesize:766 KiB
Date added:Mar 23, 2011
Dimensions:2592 x 1944 pixels
Displayed:71 times
Color Space:sRGB
Contrast:0
DateTime Original:2011:03:15 18:57:09
Exposure Bias:0 EV
Exposure Mode:0
Exposure Program:Program
Exposure Time:1/30 sec
FNumber:f/3.6
Flash:No Flash
Focal length:7.5 mm
ISO:382
Light Source:Unknown: 0
Make:Hewlett-packard
Max Aperture:f/3
Model:HP DVC V5061u
URL:http://www.galleryoflights.org/mb/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=5659
Favorites:Add to Favorites

Comment 1 to 4 of 4
Page: 1

rjluna2   [Mar 23, 2011 at 01:11 PM]
Sounds like back to some kind of old idea with slightly higher wattage bulb and slightly longer life that was marketed from Commonweath Edison of Chicago.
Silverliner14B   [Mar 23, 2011 at 08:25 PM]
Note it is 3000 hours, the longer life makes it less efficient. The 1000 hour halogens are as bright as their higher wattage incandescent counterparts.
Lumalux   [Mar 28, 2011 at 08:23 PM]
What a positively horrible name -- Ener-saver. Makes no sense and does not roll off the tongue. Smile

Nice nickel-plated brass base, though.
TiCoune66   [Mar 28, 2011 at 09:17 PM]
Well you DO save energy with those, but they're only slightly more efficient than incandescents. For almost 2,50$ per bulb, they're not really worth it for most applications, except for enclosed fixture as I said in the description (because they run much cooler). Just put a 40W incandescent and you'll save as much LOL.

Comment 1 to 4 of 4
Page: 1
Powered by Coppermine Photo Gallery