Gallery of Lights


Home Login
Album list Last uploads Last comments Most viewed Top rated My Favorites Search
Home > Public Albums > Gear
Notice Something That Isn't Quite Right?
Looks carefully at the two pieces and let me know if you find what I'm talking about. :-D
Keywords: Gear

Notice Something That Isn't Quite Right?

Looks carefully at the two pieces and let me know if you find what I'm talking about. :-D

new_pics_013.JPG GOL060714_008.JPG GOL060714_009.JPG GOL060714_010.JPG GOL060714_012.JPG
File information
Filename:GOL060714_009.JPG
Album name:Mike / Gear
Keywords:Gear
Company and Date Manufactured:Fisher Pierce - February 1998
Filesize:206 KiB
Date added:Jun 08, 2014
Dimensions:1999 x 1061 pixels
Displayed:80 times
Color Space:sRGB
DateTime Original:2009:03:27 01:11:22
Exposure Bias:0 EV
Exposure Mode:0
Exposure Time:1/12 sec
FNumber:f/2.8
Flash:No Flash
Focal length:28.8125 mm
Light Source:Unknown: 0
Make:Vivicam
Model:V5024
URL:http://www.galleryoflights.org/mb/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=17617
Favorites:Add to Favorites

Comment 1 to 9 of 9
Page: 1

lite_lover   [Jun 08, 2014 at 01:27 AM]
The year/date is off a little Very Happy I guess they had some housings left over.
streetlight98   [Jun 08, 2014 at 02:30 AM]
Yeah they must have over-produced the 1997 covers. Joe Maurath Jr said Fisher Pierce had a lot of PCs like this with the cover being from the previous year in the 90s. Some being off by over six months i think! I guess it was a Pacific Scientific thing...

My guess as to why this was at the ReStore was because someone thought it was a photocell (since the box doesn't mention open cap at all. In fact, it's the same box the PCs of that time used, just a numerical code that's the part number for the open cap but you wouldn't know unless you opened it up and the person might have thought it was just an orange PC. And when it "didn't work" they shoved it back in the box and gave it to the Restore lol. I know the box was opened because the flaps were a little bent up/damaged.
joe_347V   [Jun 08, 2014 at 03:20 AM]
Dates wrong and the case still says "photoelectric control". Laughing
streetlight98   [Jun 08, 2014 at 03:34 AM]
yeah they use the same covers for PCs and open caps. My FP shorting cap from 1977 say photoelectric control too. The box on this is pretty misleading too. besides the obvious orange color, the OPEN CAP text on the wedge sticker on the base is the only thing that tells you its an open cap.
joe_347V   [Jun 08, 2014 at 05:48 AM]
Ahh, I figured they probably use the same case to save money. Razz It would have been nice if they marked the OPEN CAP on it more clearly though. I'm sure someone has mistaken these for either a PC or a shorting cap before. Razz
HPSM250R2   [Jun 08, 2014 at 02:47 PM]
Manufacturers still have the same problem with the dates being off. I have gotten new photocontrols from both Ripley and Sun-Tech that have the date on the cover different from the date on the base. Like Darren said, they over-produce covers sometimes.
streetlight98   [Jun 08, 2014 at 04:51 PM]
Joe; Yeah that's probably how it ended up at the ReStore, the guy probably bought it off ebay thinking it was a PC and when it "didn't work" the guy put it back in the box and gave it to the ReStore lol.

Ryan; yeah the dates are usually off for the first few weeks but some 90s FPs were off a lot! I guess they really overproduced them one year. I always thought they just stamped the date with a heat stamp on top. Makes sense to me.
HPSM250R2   [Jun 08, 2014 at 05:15 PM]
Yeah. Well I have a Ripley New York City certified photocontrol that I ordered brand new from Ripley and the date code on the base is from 4-5-12 and the cover says "09" Shocked
streetlight98   [Jun 08, 2014 at 05:19 PM]
09! Shocked I guess Ripley hasn't been selling many of those lately lol. Laughing

Comment 1 to 9 of 9
Page: 1